15 March 2023

It pays to read the small print and give yourself plenty of time when submitting tenders.

A recent law case has highlighted the need for suppliers to read the tender documentation thoroughly and adjust their plans to give themselves plenty of time to submit on electronic tender portals.

๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ โ€“ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฐ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฎ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ

๐—œ๐—ป๐—›๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜๐—ต ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜ƒ ๐—ก๐—›๐—ฆ ๐—˜๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ [๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฏ] ๐—˜๐—ช๐—›๐—– ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฎ (๐—ง๐—–๐—–)

This recent judgment involved the NHS successfully defending another procurement law challenge. A bidder failed to submit their bid on time and was, compliantly the court has found, excluded from taking any further part in the process. The case concerned NHS Englandโ€™s procurement of contracts, divided into 4 lots, for the provision of Child Health Information Services. The ITT stated, that: โ€œThe Contracting Authorities will not consider any tender response received after the stated deadline, and failure to submit a response by the deadline will result in the exclusion of the bidder from participating any further in this procurement.โ€ and that โ€œNote: The e-tendering portal In-tend does not accept files with the same name.โ€

The claimant, InHealth Intelligence Limited, had attempted to submit their bid at 11.49am ahead of the deadline of noon that day. They encountered a series of error messages on the portal, attributable to the presence of a file of the same name having already been uploaded. The issue was not resolved by midday and the claimantโ€™s tender was not submitted on time.ย 

An investigation followed between the authority and portal provider, which provided no evidence of fault at their end, the claimant's bid was excluded for non-compliance. The claimant challenged the design of the portal, which it said was defective, the transparency of the โ€˜errorโ€™ message, and the lawfulness of the decision. The Court found the error message was "perfectly clear", and the decision to exclude their tender was not irrational, manifestly erroneous or otherwise in breach of the Regulations.